Top 10 Property Facts LPs Care About
Essential asset-level insights that drive institutional investment decisions in multifamily real estate
Property Fundamentals
Physical Condition of the Asset
Limited partners demand comprehensive knowledge of the actual physical state of every critical building system. This goes far beyond a cursory walk-through—investors want detailed assessments of roofs, plumbing infrastructure, electrical systems, HVAC equipment, structural foundations, and any deferred maintenance that has accumulated over time.
A thorough Property Condition Assessment (PCA) conducted by a qualified third-party engineer provides the foundation for underwriting capital expenditure requirements. LPs scrutinize these reports to identify both immediate needs and long-term replacement schedules, understanding that deferred maintenance can significantly impact returns and create unexpected cash drains during the hold period.
Critical Systems
- Roof integrity and age
- Plumbing infrastructure
- Electrical capacity
- HVAC condition
Assessment Tools
- Third-party PCA
- Deferred maintenance log
- Replacement schedules
Asset Profile
Vintage and Construction Type
The year an asset was built and its construction methodology fundamentally shape its investment profile. Vintage directly correlates with construction standards, building codes in effect at the time, material choices, and energy efficiency—all of which cascade into operating expenses, capital expenditure requirements, and insurance premiums.
1
Original Build Date
Base construction year and applicable building codes at time of completion
2
Major Renovations
Capital improvement history including building envelope, systems upgrades, and unit interiors
3
Material Composition
Wood frame, steel, concrete, or mixed construction types affecting longevity and insurance
4
Code Compliance
ADA accessibility, life safety systems, and current regulatory conformance status
Properties built in different eras carry distinct characteristics: pre-1980s assets often feature solid construction but lack energy efficiency and may contain outdated materials. Buildings from the 1980s-1990s may face significant systems replacement needs. Post-2000 construction typically offers better efficiency but shorter component life expectancy. Understanding these nuances allows LPs to accurately model future capital needs and competitive positioning.
Revenue Analysis
Unit Mix and Rent Distribution
Sophisticated investors analyze the property's unit composition in granular detail, examining how many units fall into each bedroom/bathroom configuration, the average rental rate for each unit type, and the property's exposure to any single unit class that could create concentration risk.
A well-diversified unit mix protects against market shifts in renter preferences. Properties overly concentrated in studios or three-bedroom units face heightened demand volatility. Understanding the rent distribution across unit types also reveals opportunities for optimization through renovations or repositioning strategies that can drive incremental revenue growth.
Studio/1BR Mix
Singles and young professionals driving demand and turnover patterns
2BR Distribution
Core demographic with balanced demand and stable retention
3BR+ Exposure
Family-oriented units with longer lease terms but limited demand pool
Leading operators provide detailed rent rolls showing unit-by-unit rent levels, lease expiration dates, and variance from market rates. This transparency allows LPs to stress-test assumptions about rental growth, identify value-add opportunities through strategic rent positioning, and evaluate the property's ability to weather economic downturns across different renter segments.
Operational Metrics
In-Place Occupancy and Rent Roll Quality
Headline occupancy figures tell only part of the story. Discerning limited partners distinguish between economic occupancy (percentage of potential rent actually collected) and physical occupancy (percentage of units with signed leases). This distinction reveals the true revenue-generating capacity of the asset and exposes any collection issues or value leakage through concessions.
94%
Physical Occupancy
Units with signed leases in place
89%
Economic Occupancy
Actual rent collected vs potential revenue
3.2%
Delinquency Rate
Percentage of rent uncollected past 30 days
$850
Average Concession
Per-unit incentives in current market
Rent roll quality extends beyond current occupancy to include delinquency rates, outstanding tenant balances, concession packages offered, and the lease maturity schedule. A property with 95% physical occupancy but 10% of tenants more than 30 days delinquent presents materially different economics than one with 92% occupancy and pristine collections. LPs also examine lease expiration schedules to understand rollover risk and renewal rate assumptions embedded in business plan projections.
Capital Planning
CapEx Requirements and Timing
Immediate Needs
Critical repairs required within first 12 months to maintain operations and habitability
Near-Term CapEx
Planned improvements in years 1-3 including value-add renovations and systems upgrades
Long-Term Reserves
Replacement reserve requirements for items with 5+ year useful life remaining
Capital expenditure forecasting represents one of the most critical underwriting components. LPs demand detailed line-item budgets showing what must be addressed immediately versus items that can be deferred, per-unit renovation costs with supporting contractor quotes, and adequate contingency reserves for unexpected discoveries.
The timing and sequencing of capital deployment dramatically impacts cash flow and returns. A $20,000 per-unit interior renovation program might be staged over 24 months to minimize disruption and match turnover patterns, while critical roof replacement may require immediate funding. Sophisticated sponsors provide detailed CapEx waterfalls showing monthly funding requirements, expected rent premiums achieved, and sensitivity analysis around cost overruns.
Performance History
Historical Operating Performance
Past performance provides the foundation for future projections. Limited partners meticulously analyze trailing 12-month (T-12), trailing 24-month (T-24), and trailing 36-month (T-36) operating statements to understand income stability, expense trends, and performance volatility across different market conditions.
Historical analysis reveals patterns that inform forward assumptions: Have rents grown consistently or erratically? Do expenses spike unexpectedly? How did the property perform during the last economic downturn? Properties with stable, predictable NOI growth and demonstrated expense control command premium valuations, while assets with volatile performance require deeper return premiums to compensate for execution risk.
LPs also benchmark historical performance against comparable properties and market averages to assess management quality and competitive positioning. A property consistently underperforming its peer set may indicate operational inefficiencies but also represents an opportunity for value creation through improved management.
Operating Efficiency
Utilities and Billing Structure
Master-Metered
Property owner pays entire utility bill, creating expense exposure and misaligned tenant incentives toward conservation
RUBS Implementation
Ratio Utility Billing System allocates costs based on square footage, occupancy, or other factors, improving expense recovery
Individual Sub-Metering
Direct tenant billing through individual meters, providing full cost recovery and incentivizing tenant conservation behaviors
The structure of utility billing dramatically impacts operating expenses and NOI. Master-metered properties where the owner pays all utilities create significant expense exposure, particularly with energy-intensive tenants. These properties may face $300-500 per unit annually in non-recoverable utility costs that directly reduce net operating income.
Progressive properties implement Ratio Utility Billing Systems (RUBS) to allocate costs proportionally or invest in individual sub-metering to achieve full cost recovery. The ability to pass through utility expenses to tenants can improve NOI by 3-5% while incentivizing energy conservation. LPs closely evaluate the property's current utility structure and opportunities for enhancement through billing system improvements or capital investment in sub-metering infrastructure.
Market Position
Competitive Differentiation
In competitive multifamily markets, differentiation determines rent durability and occupancy stability. Limited partners evaluate the property's amenity package, unit layouts, parking availability, and distinctive features that justify rent premiums and support long-term competitive positioning.
Amenities drive renter preference but require ongoing maintenance capital. A property with a resort-style pool, fitness center, dog park, and coworking spaces appeals to different demographics than a basic property with minimal amenities. The key question: do the amenities generate sufficient rent premiums to justify their cost?
Premium Amenities
Pools, fitness centers, clubhouses that command rent premiums
Unit Layouts
Open concepts, natural light, efficient space utilization
Parking Ratios
Adequate covered and uncovered parking for resident and guest vehicles
Parking ratios prove critical in suburban markets where automobile dependency is high. Properties with 1.5-2.0 parking spaces per unit enjoy competitive advantages over those with inadequate parking. Interior features like in-unit washer/dryer, modern finishes, smart home technology, and energy-efficient appliances support rent growth and reduce turnover. Investors assess whether the property's differentiation is sustainable or if competitors can easily replicate key features, eroding any competitive advantage.
Risk Assessment
Environmental and Insurance Risk
Climate-related risks have moved from theoretical concerns to immediate underwriting factors that directly impact insurance costs, debt availability, and exit valuations. Limited partners conduct thorough due diligence on environmental hazards and insurability to avoid properties that may become economically obsolete or uninsurable.
Flood Zone Designation
FEMA flood maps indicating 100-year or 500-year flood plain exposure, requiring flood insurance and potentially limiting financing options. Properties in high-risk zones face premium increases of 25-40% annually.
Wind and Hurricane Risk
Coastal properties exposed to named storm events face elevated wind insurance premiums and potential coverage limitations. Some coastal markets now require catastrophic loss modeling and increased reserve requirements.
Wildfire Exposure
Properties in wildland-urban interface zones face growing insurability challenges as carriers exit high-risk markets. California, Colorado, and other Western states see annual premium escalations exceeding 30% in fire-prone areas.
Claims History
Prior loss history directly impacts future insurance pricing and availability. Properties with multiple claims may face difficulty securing comprehensive coverage at reasonable rates, creating operational and financing constraints.
Beyond natural hazards, LPs review Phase I environmental assessments to identify potential soil or groundwater contamination, asbestos, lead paint, or other environmental liabilities that could trigger costly remediation. Insurance market conditions fluctuate significantly, and properties in high-risk zones may see insurance costs double or triple during the hold period, dramatically impacting returns. Some properties have become functionally obsolete due to insurance costs exceeding $2,000 per unit annually, making them economically unviable.
Long-Term Viability
Functional Obsolescence Risk
Properties age physically and functionally. While physical depreciation can be addressed through capital investment, functional obsolescence—when a property's design no longer meets market expectations—poses more fundamental challenges. Limited partners evaluate whether an asset's core characteristics will remain competitive over a 5-10 year hold period.
Unit layouts that made sense decades ago may feel cramped or inefficient by today's standards. Properties with galley kitchens, limited natural light, choppy floor plans, or small bathrooms struggle to compete with modern construction featuring open concepts and contemporary design. Ceiling heights below 9 feet, narrow hallways, and limited storage create tangible competitive disadvantages.
Layout Efficiency
Open floor plans, natural light, flexible living spaces aligned with modern preferences
Ceiling Heights
9+ foot ceilings commanding premiums over 8-foot standard construction
Parking Adequacy
Sufficient spaces per unit to meet resident demand without expensive structured additions
Parking ratios below market expectations create functional obsolescence that cannot be easily remedied. Adding structured parking costs $20,000-35,000 per space, making it economically infeasible for most value-add strategies. Similarly, properties with awkward site configurations limiting future expansion or renovation options face long-term competitive pressures.
The best properties age gracefully because their fundamental design—unit sizes, layouts, site configuration, parking—remains relevant across market cycles. Buildings with flexible floor plans, good bones, and timeless design elements weather obsolescence better than those with design quirks or space constraints that renovation cannot overcome. Investors underwrite terminal cap rate assumptions that reflect functional obsolescence risk, with properties showing early signs of design obsolescence requiring 50-75 basis points of additional yield to compensate for reduced exit demand.